However, little has been explored about how this relates to the neighborhood scale and, more importantly, how the type of density growth impacts urban form, governance structures, and community social ties, which are essential elements for the development of resilient communities. Most of this work has focused on the family unit scale, concentrating on housing asset growth as related to the family historical narrative, legal status, social image, and financing. Scholars have vastly explored incremental growth of informal settlements as one of their defining features. Slum upgrading can be an effective mechanism that combines mitigation and adaptation efforts whilst addressing sustainable development priorities in disadvantaged territories. Six key areas emerged from the analysis of the case studies that link slum upgrading to climate change adaptation and mitigation through infrastructure and policies: (1) security of tenure, (2) relocation and barriers, (3) public space, (4) energy-efficient and improved architecture, (5) connectivity, and (6) land management. The analysis revealed that slum upgrading is both a policy mechanism to address socio-economic issues and an instrument by which built-environment interventions can enhance adaptation and mitigation in informal settlements. This article scrutinizes three recent slum upgrading programs in Latin America to uncover the ways these tend to engage or not with climate change adaptation and mitigation. How slum upgrading interventions engage with climate change adaptation and mitigation is not fully explored in the literature. Different responses have emerged to intervene in these communities and slum upgrading is currently considered the best framework. Residents of informal settlements are some of the most vulnerable urban groups to the effects of climate change. The findings here are vital to resolve important questions about the role of informal urban development in the context of accelerated global population growth. This finding validates the comparison of multiple settlements to understand rates of change of urban informality worldwide. We found peri-urban location to be a suitable estimator of informal settlement growth. The survey of growth corroborates the idea of informality as expanding geography, although at different rates than previously cited in the literature. The third stage classifies settlements based on how adjacency features such as development, topography, or bodies of water relate to their growth. It then focuses on mapping urban growth with remote sensing and direct mapping tools. The main research goal is to identify a standard global sample of informal neighborhoods. This paper presents the findings from a collection of standardized measurements of 260 informal settlements across the world. However, we lack a consistent mapping method to pinpoint where that informality is located or how it expands. It is expected that by the mid twenty-first century, up to three billion people will live in informal urban environments. Informal settlements are the most common form of urbanization on the planet, accounting for one-third of the total urban form. Keywords: decolonial, solidarity, self-management, Quito, MedellĂn We argue that mingas and convites have shaped cities and crystalise decolonial ways of knowing, planning and (re)producing space. While for Medellin we will use the case of the trajectory of the neighbourhood of Moravia. To spatially visualise the impacts that multiple mingas had in shaping urban space, the case of ComitĂ© del Pueblo in Quito will be introduced. Drawing on our research on the urban legacy of the Andean minga and the Colombian convite in shaping the cities of Quito and Medellin respectively, we analyse their organising principles, plural uses, potentials, and the risks of co-optation. This essay offers a joint reflection on two Latin American city-making practices from a decolonial lens. Engaging with space co-production in Latin America urges us to learn from the long-term spatial practices of solidarity and self-management that gave rise to popular neighbourhoods. While decolonial debates are mushrooming in humanities and social science, the field of urban design still needs to uncover the territorial manifestations of decolonial practices to reframe its own disciplinary premises.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |